Anders Johansson schrieb:

> No it didn't. YaST was based on libzypp in 10.1 too

Sure it used libzypp too, but not only. And Yes I got here still 10.1
running and that w/o libzypp installed. The Yast's packet management works!!

> Also, your argument is a little strange. It's a little like "I uninstalled X 
> and now startx won't run anymore. What crap"

With all due respect, it's nonsense.

> Yes, YaST uses libzypp as package management backend now. Do you have 
> problems 
> with libzypp? Do you notice things that don't work? So far I haven't seen 
> many bugreports about libzypp not working.

Yes I have problems with libzyyp. I don't like things forced on me w/o
giving me any alternatives!!

> And please don't try to make silly jokes about this, because rug/zmd don't 
> use 
> libzypp for their updates.

...anymore! However it did use libzypp in 10.1.
Now when couple of users got pissed off by the brain dead 'Ximians',
Novel replaced rug with zypper.

Well but that's not the point. I don't like libzypp and I don't trust
Novell. Believe me or not, all my friends share this Point of View.
As by now we still stick to SUSE just out of sentiment to the old times
when SUSE was ours (German). Those days we knew what to expect from
SUSE-Devs but now not anymore. I will wait for the 10.3 release and then
decide whether I switch to another Distro or stick to 'Novell's SUSE'
bit longer.

Nevertheless, I respect your poit of view, but please respect mine too.
I don't want libzypp and it is my right not to.

Thx
Jan
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to