M Harris wrote: > On Sunday 08 April 2007 03:15, G.T.Smith wrote: >> The CD boot >> is a BIOS related thing not a Linux Kernel related thing, unless the >> kernel can identify the correct driver it cannot communicate with it. > Thanks everyone for your responses... yous guys are right sure > enough... it > was the driver (and a no-dma thing). In fact, the safe options pretty much > got it... whew... I mean Ubuntu would have been ok for him... but I've been > bragging up Suse for so long he was going to be disappointed to not get to > see it... anyway, I am happily loading the old Dell... Thanks dudes!
Why didn't you just install 10.2? It would seem like a good thing to do, to stay on top of things, rather than go through all that to install an out of date option. Another thing that I've found if you can boot from a CD but not read it is in a couple of my dual CD systems. And using the other CD drive (or even moving it after boot) will often fix the problem. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, an Open OS weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ UNIX is user-friendly. It's just a bit picky about who its friends are. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
