Yes, since that is a technical violation of the GPL.
Its not a violation, because it contains a link to the place where you can get the source rpms. This was discussed before. Dont make affirmatives you cant prove. You might as well take a read in the GPL text, so you can fully understand it, will improve your understanding. If it was a violation, 10.2 and 10.1 boxes would be in violation, and we would know that in a huge carnival made in slashdot and etc, and ubuntu fanboys screaming insanely running in circles, while trying to do a 360 in the neck poltergeist style. Most people in the past didnt touch the src.rpms media, usually the last two CDs or so, and the result was that there was lots of wasted medias (aka freesbies). I myself the times I needed to use src.rpms, Ive dowloaded the 3 or 4 directly from the tree Marcio --- druid -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
