-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Thursday 2007-04-19 at 11:03 +1000, scsijon wrote:

> >/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST3320620A_5QF2M56F-part15

 
> Carlos (and others (?aj)), can you check / could you check / have you checked?
> 
> if you had the drive listed above die
> 
> and had to use a new drive
> 
> and reload from a backup (simple to do to here)
> 
> ?would the id part "5QF2M56F" have to be changed (I suspect this is the
> drive's internal I.D.) for it to work?

Yes, that's correct. The "ST3320620A" above is the disk model (seagate st 
etc), the second word I guess it is a serial number.

If that worries you, then use labels instead - but in that case, you can 
mount two partitions with the same label in order to copy data from one to 
the other.

> It looks like a good additional level for security but does worry me for
> device failure rework.

Depends on what your procedure is.


The label is dependent on the formated filesystem, it is saved somewhere 
there. If a partition is badly hosed, the label is lost: I know because it 
happened to me.

The disk ID is more resistant, and it is usable in the cryptotab file 
(label mounting doesn't work there).

- -- 
Cheers,
       Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFGJ0ixtTMYHG2NR9URAhfaAJ9RR/VVDf3RdfbpPVZ75LGb40sqmwCeKKOl
gWbEOUlZ0J1BkKbViYmT0Dc=
=EcIy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to