On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:54 +0200, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: > Mandag 30 april 2007 15:35 skrev Gavin Chester: > > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 07:07 -0600, Pueblo Native wrote: > > > Are you downloading it, or installing it as a RPM? The latter should > > > eliminate any of those problems. > > > > Can't go wrong with that advice, but the only thing I would add is to > > switch to 'smart' for package management. Once you add the useful set of > > repositories it leaves yast for dead and will 'smartly' resolve and > > dependency issue like you saw with OO.o If unsure, google for 'smart' > > on suse. > > > > Gavin > > Wait a sec., the binary programname for OO is NOT oofice, rather it's soffice! > - what have you been installing? > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Med venlig hilsen/Best regards > Verner Kjærsgaard
No ; ooffice seems to start OpenOffice. Soffice generates the same error (but does not even get as far as the introductory banner). I wondered if one was an alias for the other, but they seem to be different executables. I'm confused.... although this might account for the fact that when I reinstalled OpenOffice from RPM's, nothing seemed to change. Gavin -- Dr Gavin Tabor Lecturer, School of Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Exeter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
