On May 02, 2007 08:55 AM, Clayton wrote: > But.. since you're obviously right... what with programming since 1980 > and all, you had better go correct the people who use the words > micro-computer since their computers are obviously too small to be > seen without instrumentation. Oh, and the people who do > micro-economics... and those poor people who drive micro-cars in the > Netherlands... oiy, that must be a challenge! Cars so small you need > a microscope to see them... wait... a microscope.. .aaaaahhh.. I'm > caught in a spiral of illogic. > Sorry to barge in on your very well defined arguments ... but this was one was easy enough for even my damaged brain not to barf at :-) Micro in a micro-computer, was referring to the technology used in creating the chips which used to be micro technology, and which today should actually be nano-computers, since they are being created with nano-technology these days. Although micro today, is probably redefined by all the incredibly intelligent people in the world, as so many other things :-) ... but back in those days, that's what it was taken to mean, and referred to as meaning. :-) Again, sorry ... just had to spew out my .02€ worth :-)
----------------------------------------- Aegroto, dum anima est, spes esse dicitur Powered by Open-Xchange.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
