On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 12:45 +0200, Raúl Moratalla wrote: > El Domingo, 6 de Mayo de 2007 09:05, John Andersen escribió: > > > But that's not the point. People often think that someone has to provide > > > the sources in any case for GPL software. But only people having access > > > to the binaries must get access to the sources also. So only if you are > > > a SLED customer you can ask for the sources for the GPL'ed software on > > > it. > > > > That's my interpretation too, only if you distribute the product do you > > need to give source, so one could take the position that until one > > purchases a copy no distribution takes place (evaluation software aside). > > Therefore there is no requirement to give source to anyone except paying > > customers.
I think that as soon as you make it public (ie. not only for internal/personal use) you have to make the sources available. I guess a follow up question to that would be; If you don't modify the sources at all, but simply package them (without any patches etc), do you still have to make them available? Cheers, Magnus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
