-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-05-10 at 14:36 +0200, Joachim Schrod wrote: > > Joachim, why do you always change the Message-Id in the In-Reply-To field > > in your reply mail. > > This breaks the thread! > > Hmm, the thread is signified by the References header, not by the In-Reply-To > header. See RFC 2822, section 3.6.4. > > My In-Reply-To header is different because I don't follow the mailing list > directly, but use the news gateway at nntp://news.gmane.org/. The posting that > I reply to has the changed message header which gets copied to In-Reply-To. > The thread's message ids itself are correctly listed in the References header. > > Well, at least Pine, Thunderbird, Seamonkey, GNUS, Emacs VM, handle it as > intended. Not completely. Look: 4447 07-05-09 19:36 G T Smith (7123) . | |-> 4448 07-05-09 21:24 Sandy Drobic (5853) | |-> * 4449 07-05-10 12:16 Joachim Schrod (5720) . | |-> A 4450 07-05-10 20:12 Masaru Nomiya (5731) . | |-> 4451 07-05-10 14:02 To: OS-en (6096) | | |-> 4452 07-05-10 14:36 Joachim Schrod (6666) | |-[opensuse] Re: mail headers (was: The mail in question is marked with "*" as an answer to mail number 4447, whereas it is in fact an answer to 4448 from Sandy. The thread may be correctly identified, but the exact parent email is not, and this happens because the In-Reply-To header is incorrect. For the same reason, the email 4452 is shown as a reply to 4449, whereas it is a reply to 4450. It may be not your fault, but nevertheless, it is not correct. :-) - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFGQ3qYtTMYHG2NR9URAtsKAJ9EcVZT+DilFUno/n7a9qLBxnoXZACeLVY/ Pg4kpsN5lZrAUDJ4NJtrrbw= =bq1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
