Hello, In the Message;
Subject : [opensuse] Re: mail headers (was: Postfix + Cyrus IMAP + MySQL won't work :-() Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date & Time: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:36:25 +0200 [Joachim] == Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has written: Me>> Joachim, why do you always change the Message-Id in the In-Reply-To field Me>> in your reply mail. Me>> This breaks the thread! Sorry for unsufficient explanation. Joachim> Hmm, the thread is signified by the References header, not by the Joachim> In-Reply-To header. See RFC 2822, section 3.6.4. I know. Of cource, my MUA (=Wanderlust) always see References field. By encountering Thread's break, I changes setteings as follows; (setq elmo-msgdb-prefer-in-reply-to-for-parent t) This is to caorrect thread easier. Joachim> My In-Reply-To header is different because I don't follow the mailing Joachim> list directly, but use the news gateway at nntp://news.gmane.org/. The Joachim> posting that I reply to has the changed message header which gets Joachim> copied to In-Reply-To. The thread's message ids itself are correctly Joachim> listed in the References header. Don't you know? Your MUA changed Message-ID in the Reference field, too! Like this; Original Message-ID is [EMAIL PROTECTED] In your mail; References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Is this reasonable with respect to RFC? Joachim> Well, at least Pine, Thunderbird, Seamonkey, GNUS, Emacs VM, handle it Joachim> as intended. Surprised! But how? Do these MUAs see Reference field? I don't think so. Regards, --- Masaru Nomiya mail-to: nomiya @ galaxy.dti.ne.jp "Bill! You married with Computers. Not with Me!" "No..., with money." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
