-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-05-14 at 02:15 +0200, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 15:54:13 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
>
> >It certainly wasn't done for technical reasons, seems like mostly a cost
> >issue.
>
> It's not true, unless you count maintainability as a cost issue. Plus
> there will be an update path from ext3 to ext4, something that
> reiserfs can't offer. And besides there being no path from reiserfs3
> to reiserfs4, reiserfs4 with its metadata that can be changed by
> plugins is a maintenance nightmare.
I understand he thinks about going to xfs instead of ext3, not about
leaving reiserfs.
And I agree with the advisability of the decision to drop reiserfs as
default fs, although I like that filesystem a lot, and I keep using it.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFGR6/atTMYHG2NR9URAij7AJwMf4C+f181wcVlfW2f2KG+oYFS3QCeLeHr
imUzmkU8tJW3+y754Ug8E5Y=
=QCSD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
