-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Carlos E. R. wrote:
> 
> The Friday 2007-05-18 at 23:51 +0100, G T Smith wrote:
> 
>>> Mmmm... The "/usr" directory is a typical one to have on a separate
>>> partition, and in that case there can't be hardlinks from outside. If some
>>> programs requires hardlinks, it is a bug.
>>>
>> Probably not, I do remember that the directories concerned were
>> originally on the same partition, ln by default creates hardlinks.
>> Shuffling key system directories around different partitions is not
>> really a normal activity and one cannot really expect those who setup
>> configurations to take account every slightly loopy activity of the user
>> community ;-)
> 
> It is certainly not loopy as it is talked about as some times recomended 
> in the admin book written by SuSE.
> 
> I myself have part of /usr on a different partition in this system, and 
> entirely out on another older system, without any problems for years.
> 
> There are some directories that have to remain in the same partition as /, 
> but /usr is not one of them.
> 

I think my point has been missed. Putting different parts of the tree on
different partitions on initial install is normative. Separating system
and application directories from user data space (and log directories)
is good practice on Windows, Linux and Netware based systems.

Moving system and application directories around after installation
usually means someone has got their sums wrong (Netware had the nifty
capability of extending logical volumes across multiple partitions,
which meant that  all you did was plug in another chunk of disk space
when you running a bit low on storage in another area so one rarely
needed to do this kind of directory juggling but this not an option on
Windows or Linux based systems).

In my case the machines role had changed and I ran into space problems
because I was installing more than I had initially planned...  I should
have performed some more rigorous checks before moving things around
which really is down to me in the end ....


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGTrQlasN0sSnLmgIRAoKBAKCSd+9xzsXoPO0exlfBf55L7WmIxACeNs1S
vIqkcC7wZsTbpARJSx7cLf0=
=t4dq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to