On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 03:00 -0700, Martin Mielke wrote: > Hi all, > > far from wanting another "religious war"... is it me or is Evolution more > feature-rich than Thunderbird?
My reason for choosing evolution is that it does a better job than Thunderbird or kmail of handling IMAP mail stores. Especially when there are many many files in many many sub-folders. kmail (reported by many, never correctly fixed) is not even ably to keep info on new messages in IMAP folders correct without you actually going in to that folder. Not possible when you have 40-50 folders. Thunderbird blocks when checking IMAP folders. I do not check needlessly often (whatever thunderbird's default time is has been used). But it results in quite a bit of hourglasses popping up when I am trying to answer some message. Evolution is always iffy when there is an update. I cross my fingers and hope. But as I keep my mail in an IMAP server, I can make do with kmail until evolution sorts itself out. Aside from that, I am a happy KDE/evolution user. -- Roger Oberholtzer OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST Ramböll Sverige AB Kapellgränd 7 P.O. Box 4205 SE-102 65 Stockholm, Sweden Tel: Int +46 8-615 60 20 Fax: Int +46 8-31 42 23 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
