On 5/23/07, Doug McGarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 20:44, Mike McMullin wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 12:42 -0400, George Stoianov wrote:
> > I think you should be using the smp kernel. What kind of a machine do
> > you have? Anything in the system logs?
>
> IIRC for 10.2 the kernel default is the smp kernel.
What happens if you use this kernel on a machine that has only
one processor, or is the install smart enough to figure all this
out?
--doug
The kernel developers got real smart in the last year or so.
The main difference between UP and SMP is the locking mechanisms. So
in a SMP it makes sense to have a spin-lock. (spin-lock == an
infinite loop waiting for a variable to change). In a UP a spin-lock
might cause a lockup (Definitely will if interrupts are disabled).
The kernel now has self-modifying code. During boot up, the low level
locking routines start out in SMP configuration, but if a UP is found
the machine code in those routines is replaced with their UP
equivalents (often no-ops).
I assume they have only done this for the most common CPU types (ie.
instruction sets).
See http://lwn.net/Articles/164121/ for more details (and accuracy)..
Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
