On 2007-06-01 03:22, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > The Thursday 2007-05-31 at 09:21 -0600, Darryl Gregorash wrote: > > > I do not even understand why syslogd is even still included in the > > distribution, unless it is for die-hard admins who think anything that > > can be understood by ordinary folk is evil :-) > > Probably because syslogd is more tested and reliable. The ng one still has > some bugs, and even missing features. Which version is in 10.2? Go to the syslog-ng homepage, current version is 2.0.
I'm not sure which features might be missing, syslog-ng doesn't encrypt or compress a log file. I suppose encryption would be important for any separate log file for facility authpriv. Does syslogd support file encryption? > > Even so, I prefer the ng one. So do I, by a large margin. -- Hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue. -- François de La Rochefoucauld -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
