On Friday 01 June 2007 15:22, Alexey Eremenko wrote: > > I'd characterize that as "similar functionality." > > > > Besides, I find it hard to believe it can speed-up the retrieval of > > something it doesn't have immediately available to serve locally. > > Even if it has something to do with the selective compression, > > that's only going to increase latency on the initial fetch and > > without a large population of users behind the device to amortize > > the costs it imposes, there's less potential for overall > > improvement. > > But it works!
You saw a carefully crafted demo. Don't assume you'd see similar performance in a real-world situation. You know what they say: Your Mileage May Vary (YMMV) > Non-cached data flows very fast with WAAS. > WAAS also has good optimization for SMB protocol. What about Squid ? Don't ask me. I've never used it. <http://www.squid-cache.org/> <http://www.google.com/> > -- > -Alexey Eremenko "Technologov" Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
