G T Smith wrote: > John E. Perry wrote: > > Russell Jones wrote: > >> ... > >> Disagree. For 100Mbps, just get Cat. 5. It'll work fine. Spend your > >> pennies on something else. > >> > > Same here. I have my home network connected with cat-5E (only a little > > more costly than cat-5 when I bought it, and it runs 100Mbps just fine > > -- even over the 40 ft to my son's room. > > > John Perry > > If I remember correctly shielding is a two way thing, basically you are > running a potential 40ft radio aerial in the latter case. If you have a > lot of cables or have anything which is sensitive to radio emissions > close by, Cat 6 starts making sense. ????
There are two ways to reduce interference to & from a cable. Those are shielding and twisted pairs. UTP cable, including CAT 6 relies on twisted pairs to reduce interference. Unless the twist rate for CAT 6 is significantly more than CAT 5, there will be little difference between the two for interference purposes. My understanding is that CAT 6 cable construction is held to tighter tolerances re twist, spacing etc. to better support higher data rates. Those tighter tolerances have little effect on interference. -- Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
