Andy Harrison wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org
iD8DBQFGe6DYNTm8fWdRgmIRAmY3AJ0bwZMLNVII7OIWJA9F4FserGIizACggx4Z
kHFUvl7wLyD6OeczSkyG9bs=
=fRW1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 6/22/07, Russell Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, yes, in a sense, but if it's not experimented with and bugs
reported, it'll never get stable will it?
You're missing the point. If it's a machine that's running multiple
vm's, then the chances are pretty good that it's a production machine.
Not the place for experimental software.
Um, quite right, it's not the place. But who suggested running it on a
production machine? Why should running VMs mean it's a production
server? Xen is OSS, for instance, and I think some VMWare products are
free to use for educational purposes.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
