On Thursday June 21 2007 5:53:18 pm Pueblo Native wrote: > While some of these points may have more or less merit to them, the > first one is a no-starter: > "There is *already a standard ISO26300 named Open Document Format > (ODF)*: a dual standard adds cost to industry, government and citizens;" > > Now, I use OO and love it, but I am not so arrogant as to assume that it > is or should be the ONLY standard out there. Let a thousand flowers > bloom and let the consumer decide what they want. As long as they have > that power, I'm happy even if they choose Microsoft's OXML format.
Yeah, I am so happy that there are 1,000+ different types of speaker wire configurations because + and - were way too inconvenient. -- Stan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
