On Friday 22 June 2007 15:10, Christophe Osuna wrote:
> > > ...
>
> Oh, well, I was expecting this. E-mail is not the best tool for bug
> tracking after all.
>
> > However, Patrick advice is good: enter false private information.
> > Like "bussiness: not your bussiness". "Phone: 555 1234"
>
> I could. But I will not, because in my opinion giving false
> information would be like using a software without agreeing with the
> EULA. I try to respect as much as possible the author's wishes, and
> in that case false information would be against it (otherwise the
> fields would not have been marked as required). I hope you can
> understand my point of view.

In my opinion, you're overreacting. What negative consequence do you 
think might ensue from you disclosing a simple bit of contact 
information to Novell? Did you read their privacy policy and conclude 
that it produced some kind of risk of exposure?


> I will just have to wait for somebody else to run into this problem
> and submit a bug report. Meanwhile I will tell my colleagues to run
> "su -c kate" instead of "su -c gedit", or start learning vim.

That's not very community-minded...


> Thanks.


Randall schulz
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to