Sloan wrote: > BandiPat wrote: > >> If you go in steps, 10.1 or are planning that, just stop at 10.1! As >> many bad things as 10.1 introduced, I think 10.2 was worse. >> > > Every one I've ever talked to that's run both says 10.2 was a huge > relief after the buggy 10.1release. > I totally agree with Joe here. 10.2 was MUCH better than 10.1. I actually upgraded to 10.2 beta 1 partly because I figured it couldn't be any worse than 10.1 was (mostly package management). 10.2 has been much better in many ways, and for the OP, I upgraded our server from 9.3 to 10.2, but I added 2 SATA drives and did a fresh install, using the old root for reconfiguring the config files in 10.2. Though I had GRUB problems, other than that, it was great. It even updated during the install to the latest security updates correctly. I would highly recommend 10.2. Disclaimer: I did uncheck zmd during the install so it was never installed from the beginning. I installed the opensuseupdater from the beginning, and it has ran quite well. BTW, I also went from 9.3 x86 to 10.2 x86_64, thus the reason to do a fresh install. I upgraded at home.
-- Joe Morris Registered Linux user 231871 running openSUSE 10.2 x86_64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
