El vie, 29-06-2007 a las 19:01 +0200, Anders Johansson escribió: > On Friday 29 June 2007 19:00:39 Hudibras wrote: > > Yes. I saw time ago a severe security fix for Postfix... qmail doesn't > > have ANY ONE. > > CAN-2005-1515
Sorry... I didn't know this issue, but it's only with Linux... that says much about Linux security??? Dan Bernstein (the qmail author) says he doesn't like Linux, his choice is BSD. If qmail can be exploited on a BSD box, I will then say that qmail is not as secure as everyone says. I do complain about not to be much explicit in English. I would say more things in Spanish. So, sorry everyone! Bye, Alejandro. > > > > > Sendmail had some problems with > > > security some years ago. In the last years I they tightened their code a > > > lot. Though I do remember that Sendmail had a remote exploitable bug last > > > year. > > > > Yes. Sendmail is already history... > > Sendmail is used bz considerably more, and considerably larger installations > than qmail. > > But let's stop the hearsay debate, OK? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
