Carlos E. R. wrote: > > The Friday 2007-06-29 at 12:43 -0700, Sloan wrote: > >> Our look at qmail was some years ago so it's getting a bit fuzzy now. >> ISTR that qmail seemed to be full of gratuitous differences in the >> interface with no tangible benefit. I won't deny that it seemed smaller >> and cleaner than sendmail, but the message store by inode was one deal >> breaker, as I mentioned. Also ISTR that we would have needed thousands >> of alias files to do what we were doing in sendmail. > > > If I'm not mistaken, in postfix the queue files are also related to the > inodes and can not be moved. After a restore and before starting the > postfix server you need to run ... I forgot the name, to scan the queues > and change the filenames appropriately. It must be explained somewhere in > the faq.
Ah yes - the postsuper utility - that'ss saved me lots of work on several occasions. Does anyone know if there's some equivalent qmail utility? Joe -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
