On Monday 23 July 2007 22:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sunday 22 July 2007 14:35:07 Rajko M. wrote: > > On Saturday 21 July 2007 22:24, you wrote: > > .... > > OK Rajko, I am going to trim this post quite a bit. All read over several > times and thoroughly digested. I hope that won't mess you up. I will > confine it to providing information and questions. > > OK, ran ls /sys/bus/i2c/devices/9191-0290 and the following was listed in > that directory. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls /sys/bus/i2c/devices/9191-0290 > alarms fan3_div in2_max in8_input temp1_max_hyst > beep_enable fan3_input in2_min in8_max temp1_type > beep_mask fan3_min in3_input in8_min temp2_input > bus hwmon:hwmon0 in3_max name temp2_max > driver in0_input in3_min power > temp2_max_hyst fan1_div in0_max in4_input pwm1 > temp2_type fan1_input in0_min in4_max pwm2 > temp3_input fan1_min in1_input in4_min pwm3 > temp3_max fan2_div in1_max in7_input subsystem > temp3_max_hyst fan2_input in1_min in7_max temp1_input > temp3_type fan2_min in2_input in7_min temp1_max > uevent [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> > > As you can see....there is no vrm and I guess is not compiled in > andsensors-s will never see it.
OK. Than we can forget it for now. .... > > *** Missing *** > > We don't have sensors output with default values. > > Not absolutely sure but I think my first posting was from the default > values. OK. .... > OK I cut and pasted your suggested/trial parameters into the one line > sensors.conf and ran sensors -s. (as root) Got another error: > > EasyStreet:/ # sensors -s > Error: Line 4: Invalid keyword > General parse error > > I looked at until my eyes glazed over. I can't see it. > > Here are the first few lines from your suggested conf that reportedly > contains the error: Hmm... The only thing I can see is missing comments behind statemets in original sensors.conf, so it would be "sensors -s" parser problem. Try the same proposal when you remove all comments behind statements like in example below. chip "w83627thf-*" # Voltage section label in0 "VCore" set in0_min 1.50 set in0_max 1.56 label in1 "+3.3V" set in1_min 3.14 set in1_max 3.47 > > [1] In todays computers it is probably thermistor and temperature value > > will be different than for diode. The only difference can be thermistor > > Beta value. The 3435 is from examples sensors, but values can be changed > > to get same reading as BIOS: > > CPU 55 degrees C > > Sys Tmp 45 degrees C > > I guess that when you change sensor type to thermistor it will show > > proper CPU temperature. If > > sensors -s > > reports "Unknown feature name" than something is wrong. > > > > [2] For temperature limits and hysteresis we need exac tCPU model and > > datasheet. I recall last time I played with sensors that diode and transistor were way off. Though thermistor was simple choice 3, not Beta value. BTW, that option doesn't work here with different chip, so either I have to look in source, which is not my strength, or see how to contact developers. -- Regards, Rajko. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
