Dear Andreas,
dear listmembers,
I found the reason for the failure - without the ability to explain. For the
building process I was using a special rpmrc without the "-g" option because
this is needed IMHO for building the kernel based on the suse packaging
concept.
This missing "-g" screwed things up for glibc. If I leave "-g" in all tests
(besides the floating point issue) pass smoothly, the tst-signal1 as well.
If someone has an explanation, I'd be more than happy to understand :-)
By the way: upgrading is not fun. New releases come with new bugs - I cannot
cope with bug hunting on my main system, I needed a compiler that works
better than the one I had had before.
Everything beyond that like making linux-2.6.11 compile and run with gcc 4.1.2
is work, but can be decouplded from the system operation.
As long as programs get shipped without having ever been run only once (10.2:
xcdroast is a mess; texmacs was a mess ...) the degree of fun with upgrades
is very limited.
Thanks a lot for your feedback,
take care
Dieter
Am Freitag, 27. Juli 2007 17:49 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
> Dieter Jurzitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dear listmembers,
> > maybe offtopic, but maybe someone could give me a pointer where to ask /
> This could be a kernel bug. I would really advice to update to 10.2
> instead of updating those components yourself.
*****
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
\
/\_/\ |
| ~x~ |/-----\ /
\ /- \_/
^^__ _ / _ ____ /
<°°__ \- \_/ | |/ | |
|| || _| _| _| _|
if you really want to see the pictures above - use some font
with constant spacing like courier! :-)
-----------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
