在 2007-07-30一的 14:37 +0100，Dave Howorth写道： > Zhang Weiwu wrote: > > [office A] <-almost impossible to connect-> [office C] > > [office B] <-almost impossible to connect-> [office C] > > [office B] <- very fast and realiable -> [office A] > > [office B] <- very fast and realiable -> [internet server "bossdog"] > > [office C] <- very fast and realiable -> [internet server "bossdog"] > > [office A] <-almost impossible to connect-> [internet server "bossdog"] > > I think you can solve this just by adding explict routes and gateways. > It's probably also possible to use VPNs but I have no experience with them. > > I think you need to tell A (hatch) that all traffic for C or bossdog > must be sent via gateway B (renaissance), tell C (wosbj) that all > traffic for A or B must be sent via gateway bossdog, tell B that all > traffic for C must be sent via gateway bossdog and tell bossdog that all > traffic for A must be sent via gateway B. Then all traffic should use a > good path.
How can this be possible? I mean probably I am stupid but this is not what I learnt for what route is supposed to do. e.g. if I specify all traffict from hatch (125.77.224.26) to bossdog (211.157.108.128) should go through renaissance (125.77.226.195), this wouldn't work: there is no direct (directy = without route) connection between hatch and renaissance because hatch and renaissance are not in one sub-net. I think router can only route something to the next gateway that have direct connection. If hatch needs several routes to reach renaissance, how can it route packets through renaissance? > > I'm sure somebody with more experience will propose something better :) > > Cheers, Dave -- 锐业软服（国内业务） http://www.realss.cn Real SoftService http://www.realss.com 销售咨询(Sales Department): 0086 592 20 99987 (Chinese, German, English) 国际业务(International Sales): 0086 10 8460 6011 (German and English) 联系：厦门大学科技园，嘉庚二号楼6楼 邮政：厦门大学2312号信箱（邮编361005） -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
