On Saturday 11 August 2007, Fernando Costa wrote: > I added the repositories in yast and the upgrade was done without > problems. Not looking any features, I'm just an upgrade frikie... :-P
I've personally found that sometimes upgrading software simply for the sake of upgrading only brings in new bugs while adding no new useful features or improvements. This has especially been the case with OpenOffice.org, and to lesser extend with KDE bug fix / stability releases. I've found myself upgrading working stuff less and less often. Now I'm back on OOo 2.0.4, as it seems the best compromise for the time being. It isn't Emacs-stable, but it isn't KWord either. It has its issues, but nothing too serious. Tero > F > > primm wrote: > > On Thursday 09 August 2007 08:24, Clayton wrote: > >>> in some cases, reboot is required. dont know why :) > > > > When I went from 2.0.4 to 2.1 I just added > > > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/OpenOffice.org/10.2-x86_64 > > > > to installation sources in yast and chose the new version. It pulled > > in some java stuff but no reboot was necessary. > > > > Just out of interest, what features o ooo are you looking for that > > are not available in the 2.0 suse version? > > > > Lynn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
