On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:15:37 +0300 Daniel Feiglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And that presumably means that SCO's claim that Linux infringes upon > Unix (copy write) code is stone dead - simply because SCO does not own Unix. Interestingly SCO does not 'own' Unix. The Unix brand is owned by The Open Group. SCO has the right to license, enhance, and distribute. They do own copyrights on their changes to Unix. > Incidentally, can SCO appeal that ruling? They certainly can, but is it worth their while. Also remember that there are some issues in the SCO vs. IBM case other than copyright infringement (which Novell waived) that affect Linux. Since this is essentially off topic, you can read the thread in the OT list. -- Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
