Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >I upgraded some lan clients to 10.2. I notice that new installs use ext3. Is >> >the latter better? Faster? Is there a problem with reiser? >> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/202780/ >> Summary: It does not scale. For uniprocessor, it should not make much >> difference. But reiser3 horribly bogs down on multi-core servers, for example >> during kernel compiles after a tarball was extracted (which is what happens >> with `rpmbuild kernel-default.spec`.) > > I am one of goofs who is hanging onto Reiser v3.... my excuse is that > it seems to survive reboots (intentional or otherwise) a lot more > elegantly than ext. That is a bit of a lame excuse I know...
In that case continue to use ReiserFS v3 - we just changed the
*default*. We still test and fix it, so feel free to use it on your
system if you prefer it,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgphhZRoBlNK3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
