On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:58:51PM +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 12:48 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Aug 29 2007 08:09, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > >On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:28 -0500, Rajko M. wrote: > > > > > >> I would rather install on another partition Beta 2 or wait few days for > > >> Beta3 > > >> (Sept. 6th). That way you get all software updated and if it doesn't > > >> work > > >> well, there is good old 10.0 installation. > > > > > >We are planning our SUSE release support for the coming year. Our > > >primary platform is 10.0. We can't decide if we should go with 10.2 or > > >10.3. 10.2 we know. 10.3 is unknown. We need to decide/commit in the > > >next month. I think it make be a bit close for choosing 10.3. > > > > Or you could use 10.2 plus a 3rd-party 2.6.22. Webpin will tell. > > Webpin? I found http://benjiweber.co.uk:8080/webpin/ > > Is that what you mean? What 3rd party kernel package does all the other > things needed to go from 2.6.13 to 2.6.22. Or whatever one introduced > big udev changes.
I guess he meant his own kernel. You can use the 2.6.22 kernel from 10.3 on 10.2. Only thing affected is likely udev/hal. Ciao, -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
