On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 08:28 +0200, Pavel Nemec wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > today i again hit problem which is known for long time. If someone > report bug which is too - much complicated / no one is able to fix it > / package maintainer is overloaded - bug assignee close this bug as > WONTFIX and ask reporter to move bug in upstream facility (another > bugzilla for example). > I understand this (as i was overloaded package maintainer also) but i > also thing it is packager responsibility to report bug to upstream and > track them here. > As I know many others are also not sure about it I am asking here. So > what is standard procedure?
The procedure we're using in the GNOME and OO groups is to use the keyword should_go_upstream and later one of us or a QA person will move the bug upstream (if its not there already) and mark the bug RESOLVED/LATER. Periodically we'll query to see if the upstream bug status has changed. Not really clear if this is scalable or not yet. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
