Doug McGarrett wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007 23:41, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
>   
>> On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 23:24 -0400, BandiPat wrote:
>>     
>>> On Saturday 22 September 2007, Fred A. Miller wrote:
>>>       
>>>> 'Never needed to FAX much till now, so I've looking for a NON-Win
>>>> modem and found this one USR has made. It's a tad pricey, but should
>>>> work well, just in case someone else is in need of one. 'Ordered
>>>> tonight.
>>>>
>>>> Fred
>>>>         
>>> ---------------
>>>
>>> And a PDF or word processing file won't do for them through email?
>>> Almost seems a bit archaic to have to resort to fax on a land line
>>> modem, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> Lee
>>>       
>> Wouldn't it be cheaper to just pick up an old fax machine?
>>
>> --
>> Ken Schneider
>> UNIX  since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE  since 1998
>>     
> For some reason, doctors and pharmacies live by FAX.  You'd think that
> there would be a world-wide medical data-base, but something about
> privacy (read "insurance companies") keeps that from happening.  There
> may be other outfits that live by FAX.  There used to be a program for
> Windows that would let you send a FAX if you had a telephone modem.
> There may be one for LINUX.  I don't know if you could receive on the
> computer.  Probably nobody is still using a telephone modem.
>
> --doug
>   
While encrypted email would certainly fix the privacy issue, some people
are still stuck in the past.  Also some, like the vet I take my pets to,
have stopped using email because of problems with viruses etc.  Of
course, the solution to that problem is Linux.



-- 
Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org>
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to