On Thursday 27 September 2007 07:47, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sep 27 2007 10:36, James Knott wrote: > >> The Thursday 2007-09-27 at 07:19 -0400, James Knott wrote: > >> > >> I know of many businesses here that do not have email, but they do have > >> a fax. And it costs me nothing, anyway. > > Well every company that still has a typical printout fax should think > again. Believe it or not, fax spam does exist, and it just eats your > ink.
My secretary gets between 50 and 100 spam faxes a day > > >> And fax is a legal document, whereas an email is not. > > Emails are, to some extent. Otherwise I do not think they could > have been used in the Microsoft/Gates hearing in fall 1998. Yes. In one of the lawsuits I'm involved in, we went back and forth with the judge as to whether we need to include emails in a discovery request since they are considered legal documents. ATM, we've decided to hold off unless they specifically request emails or subpoena our email databases. -- kai ponte www.perfectreign.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
