Per Jessen wrote:
> Richard Creighton wrote:
>
>   
>> I cranked up 10.2 on a
>> 486DX-2 the other day just to see it run...slow, but it ran :)
>>     
>
> How exactly did you manage that?  Have you got a 486-version of 10.2?  
>
> I've got a 486DX2 machine running as firewall/gateway, but it's stuck on
> SuSE 7.1 - I would certainly be interested in getting it upgraded to
> 10.2.  The 256Mb yast memory requirement might be a problem, but I'm
> sure I'll find a way around that.
>
>
> /Per Jessen, Zürich
>
>   
Now for a better answer to your question.  In my opinion, I doubt that
anyone could actually get a full 10.2 distro to install and run on
anything less than a Pentium/AMD-K6 or some such processor now. 
Internally, these processors support subsets that include 386 code which
of course the 486 also understands.   So, the kernel can be compiled to
run as a 386 and shun some of the Pentium centric code and should run
just fine.   It isn't the kernel that is the problem, it is all of the
support software, multimedia, graphics, word processing, ad nausium,
that we now take for granted and say 'that is 10.2' or that is SuSE or
Kubuntu or whatever.   It isn't.  SuSE is a collection which includes
Linux, as is Debian, or whatever distro you happen to like.   It is the
collection of support software that becomes the personality of the
distribution and it is also the reason our old 486 machines won't run
anymore.   It is these neat packages of music, graphics, editors and
what-not, that depend on instructions that the poor old 486 processor
simply has no concept of.   So while Linux itself can be compiled to run
in a mode that is compatible with the old box, it is unlikely the rest
of any modern distro will do so as well.   However, remember, you are
given the source code to much of the software you use and it *is*
possible that if you put your mind to it, many programs might be coerced
into a compatible mode and recompiled...not a chore for the faint of
heart.   Also, not a few of the packages include NON-OSS programs, which
mean 'sorry Charlie' because the sources are not available.   All this
said however, I challange a user of VISTA or even XP to take its' kernel
and boot on a 486...never mind all its bells and whistles, just the
kernel....Linux users can, even a modern version.  And when you get done
with the Windows trial, you can have a boat anchor, and with the Linux
box, you can have a router :)

Richard

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to