On Sun October 7 2007 07:09, Anders Johansson wrote: > Yes it's obvious. If xeons in general didn't work, nobody would be > interested in running suse (and, since processor support is a kernel thing, > not suse specific, linux in general would also not be so very interesting)
You've completely missed my point. Not everybody keeps a 'currently supported' list of processor family names churning around in their head. I happen to be one of those types of people. I didn't *assert* that XEONs weren't supported but merely pondered offhand and publicly if that could be the problem. It was a legitimate question. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
