On Wednesday 10 October 2007 02:28:24 pm Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Oct 10 2007 15:35, Sylvester Lykkehus wrote: > > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> On Oct 9 2007 20:45, Ben Kevan wrote: > >> > What's the changes of us getting a suse built build service for the > >> > 2.6.23 kernel to help utilize the new scheduler? > >> > >> chances -> not gonna happen too soon I presume (based on previous > >> evidence). 10.3 got delivered with a fairly recent kernel (2.6.22), so > >> it might come that 2.6.24 is the first to appear on the suse side. This > >> is how it happened with 2.6.18(10.2)->2.6.20. > > > > A bit off-topic > > Jan: > > Are you planning on continuing building kernel RPMS with the ccj patchset > > for _10.2_ in the future, or will you be focusing on 10.3 ? > > Why, can't upgrade to 10.3? :p > Since rebuilding is cheap, that is an option.
Wow, I really think it is a big mistake to disregard 2.6.23.. I have the vanilla installed now on my Dell D820.. and I LOVE it.. Still have to test the Wireless tonight when I am at home.. But it seems quite a bit faster, and responsive. Ben -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
