On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:50 -0500, Bryen wrote:

> This makes it a real pain to follow the rules of the road here.  And
> apparently from a recent post I observed, others are having this problem
> too.  I'm not criticizing the rules here, just asking for assistance in
> how to follow the rules here while still using Evolution, which I happen
> to like and use as my preferred client.

No big discussion wanted here. This is a can of worms. But I have to
ask:

If the list Netiquette for this list is to reply to the List, why is the
Reply-To field set to the original author? Other lists I am on have this
same preference that replies go to the list for all to see. They set the
Reply-To accordingly. And never have these endless discussions which I
expect will start right about now.

I too use Evolution and find it curious that for this list a reply does
not result in the list's preferred action. What brain-dead mail client
does not use the Reply-To field when the user wants to, um, reply?

-- 
Roger Oberholtzer

OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST
Ramböll Sverige AB
Kapellgränd 7
P.O. Box 4205
SE-102 65 Stockholm, Sweden

Tel: Int +46 8-615 60 20
Fax: Int +46 8-31 42 23

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to