On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 07:09:32AM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote: > On Tuesday 23 October 2007 06:58, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:36:00AM -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > The question is, is this actually a 64 bit update being offered in > > > a 32 bit system or is it actually a 32 bit program update that is > > > actually "needed" in a 32 bit system? and if it is a 64 bit update > > > why is it offered in a 32 bit system? > > > > This is due to the nature of our update system that shares 1 tree > > for 3 (5) platforms. The i586 updates in there have no changes, > > but the "patch" itself exists for all platforms (it is noarch). > > This is precisely the same thing I asked about in "Irrelevant Update in > openSUSE Updater" starting at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:52 (GMT). > > Since you mentioned it and I neglected to even look at the "Arch." > column in the Versions tab, I note that this is listed as "i586". > > So, is it "noarch" or i586 or x86_64? > > So far, the information we have is all quite inconsistent.
What update, openmotif or opera? The "patch" is a metafile, which is noarch. The Opera update is i586,x86_64 and ppc. The openmotif-libs22 update is i586 and x86_64. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
