-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* David Bolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-23-07 12:27]:
> I noticed. Interestingly enough, I notice that the message with the
> 846KiB uncompressed tiff as an attachment also has that same header. As
> to why the poster couldn't have used compression, I don't know. Saving
> it with Gimp as a PNG reduced it to 22KiB. A later post, also contained
> image attachments of 216KiB and 375KiB. These reduced to 17Kib and
> 25KiB.

I noticed that but didn't comment.  You *are* correct that graphics
should have been presented in the least imposing popular format.  The
presenter is/was being quite presumptious and inconsiderate.  There
are *still* list members on dial-up and/or measured service.

- -- 
Patrick Shanahan         Plainfield, Indiana, USA        HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org     Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://counter.li.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFHHiLmClSjbQz1U5oRAg8iAJQNVMIu/LMDZYFVG/BuDCtXFRmaAKCMXzr+
MPKJOHPQDpOmQL/asfoHXg==
=gQ9m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to