On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 01:23 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 04 November 2007 00:31:40 Aniruddha wrote:
> > I would like to say goodbye. During an discussion on the Packman mailing
> > list about the security policy of the Packman repo (see
> > http://schiffbauer.net/pipermail/packman/2007-November/thread.html ) I
> > realized openSUSE isn't what I looking for. To be honest this has also
> > something to do with the rude manner in which my questions were
> > answered.
> 
> The rudeness aspect I can certainly agree with. There is hardly ever a reason 
> to be rude.

Even worse theses type of discussions tend to distract from the main
argument thereby hampering any progress that could be made. 

> The security aspects however I can not. If you seriously believe that you can 
> get more security out of gentoo, you are seriously mistaken.

That would be a conclusion. And I haven't reached a conclusion yet since
I was to busy investigating and asking questions ;) 

>  And if you are 
> really basing your own commercial for-pay service on an upstream gratis 
> volunteer service, you are a lawsuit waiting to happen
> 
> You may trust gentoo, but what if something happens? No one has paid gentoo 
> anything, so why should they care? And even if they do care, they certainly 
> won't get out of bed at 2am to help you solve your problems
> 
> If you are really serious about starting an IT company and selling service to 
> your customers, you need to either be prepared to provide that service 
> yourself, or contract with some other company to do that service for you. 
> Gratis is nice, but there really are no deadlines in open source

Like I said earlier. An OS is to me  is a tool, and I would like to use
the best tool for the job. My main "tool" is Windows since 99% of my
customers use that.

Besides Windows I would like to offer an alternative. Since Linux in my
opinion is also a tool I try to determine the best tool for each job.

For one customer that can be openSUSE, another one SLED or Red Hat, etc.
etc. That's why I asked all these questions, to help me determine which
"tool" to use for which "job".

> 
> And about your thread on packman, I hope you know that a "malicious change" 
> can be as simple as changing a buffer size check from 10 to 11, or changing 
> fgets to gets. No rootkit detector in the world will find that, but after 
> such a change, a malicious user can walk right in
> 
> Anders

Interesting point. I didn't know that. This change would create a buffer
overflow attack right?


-- 
Regards,

Aniruddha

Please adhere to the OpenSUSE_mailing_list_netiquette
http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_mailing_list_netiquette


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to