Benji Weber wrote:
On 24/11/2007, Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It amounts to nothing more than wasted effort, when there
are more important things to work on.
It's good you pointed that out, because it's certainly not possible
for different people to work on different things at the same time, and
of course everyone is perfectly skilled to work on the things you
consider important.
With the list of problems in 10.3 that are posted to this
list, it's quite obvious that there aren't enough developers
taking care to make sure that the packages are actually
RIGHT in the first place. So the proposal is to take
people OFF of getting the software working, so that
perfectly good software can be totally overhauled,
rather than just adding a few tweaks.
That doesn't make ANY sense, unless you're someone who's
addicted to "new New NEW!!!!!" all the time.
But in the business community especially, that just
plain old won't cut it.
When the broken stuff is fixed THEN worry about doing
a complete rewrite of YaST.
YaST isn't broken... all it needs is a little added
functionality here and there...but NO CHANGES to
what is already working.
YaST is CURRENTLY DEBUGGED. What's the point of
doing a whole re-write, and then having to debug
it again (which if I remember correctly, took
about a year)
--
Benjamin Weber
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
