-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Druid wrote: > And yeah, you can say Im rude. > > Marcio
I don't think anyone's really been rude, though there has been a bit of an expectations mismatch. It really _is_ about just the control center UI (that's been pretty clear), but the discussion brought up some topics around yast which weren't to the straight and narrow point. So, apart from a few (light) bruises, I consider that nothing's lost; any time you get feedback from passionate users you're doing great (people in proprietary s/w shops go to great pains and spend much to get half the user feedback we get in here). Correspondingly, I think it's very reasonable for us to go something like "oh, okay, so the community has something to say about YaST so let's make that another thread". And on the other end, "oh whoops, ok you guys meant the UI only. K, I'll hop on that other thread". Now, back to the control center. Here's an idea: the use case is, someone just installed suse, heard much about the control center, and wants to dive in and use it for task X, say setting permissions. In windows, this was called "user management" and in debian it was called (say) "access control". So, they wade around the entries a bit, opening the various modules until they find what they're looking for. Now, how about if the various modules were "tagged", so searching for either "user" or "permissions" or "access" would bring up the relevant module? Bad? Good? Take-me-out-back-and-shoot-me-with-my-own-tagging-paradigm? JA - -- http://www.DonAssad.com jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please consider the environment; do you really need to print out this e-mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHSst3Fcf72sjD2+QRAtXiAJ0XbVFwJS7UtgDKR0R/A/BVYRRZ9gCgo7tv ekZ0ayb6ImPvISx4n1TXOGI= =/Xck -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
