Tue, 04 Dec 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Somewhere in the past I read that computers are wonderful machines. > Capable of great things. BUT, they are horrible clocks. > > The way it was explained was that when system use was high and resources > were strained the clock was the last thing to get updated. Thus, it > looses time. I'm sure it isn't near the problem it was many years ago > but if your a power user it still could be a problem.
don't know where you got that from, but ever since the IBM AT, PC's have had a hardware clock on the mainboard, independent of the OS or user programs. The only thing that can make those thing fail is an empty battery or broken crystal. The crystals that make these hardware clocks tick aren't the best in terms of stability or accuracy of course, but with ntp for a daily dosage of 'realtime', there's nothing wrong with the basic concept. Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E. + ICQ: 277217131 SUSE 10.3 + Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel 2.6.22 + See headers for PGP/GPG info. Claimer: any email I receive will become my property. Disclaimers do not apply. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
