Hi,

I've been fighting about with my 10.3 system today and have been
having a few issues with Grub and I was wondering if anyone knew why
they were happening.

I have a server running 32bit 10.3.  This system has a Gigabyte Intel
chipset motherboard with 6 SATA ports on the Intel controller and 2
SATA ports and a PATA port on a JMicron controller.  Controllers are
running in their basic IDE mode (i.e. not AHCI(?) or RAID modes).  On
the 6 Intel SATA ports there is a DVDRW, an ESATA port and 4 500GB
disk and on the JMicron ports there are 2 500GB (SATA) disks and a 160
PATA disk.  The 6 500GB disks are a RAID5 array (md0) and the 160GB
disk is used for the OS.

Now today I had to replace a failing 500GB drive, (which I asked about
on here previously) ... this went ok and once it was complete I
started on some other maintenance tasks.  This included patching the
OS using online update which went wrong, badly wrong.  The update
screwed up in some way and left the system in a non-bootable state
with a lot of corruption of the root filesystem and fsck basically
ended up killing the system completely, (could not even get into it in
single user mode) ... fortunately the content of the RAID array
appears unaffected.

Hence I had to reinstall and I've been having problems with Grub.  At
the end of the install process, (with the Grub configuration in the
install screen looking correct), the system was unable to do it's
first reboot without manual intervention.  The references it had put
in the menu.lst file were (hd6,0) instead of (hd0,0); the former did
not work but interacting with Grub to change to the latter allowed the
system to come up.  Once the system was up and running menu.lst was
edited to show (hd0,0) and then rebooted fine.  Now I can see this
happening if the installer is picking up disks in a different order or
something.

But I've just finished patching the new install up to date and,
fortunately, I looked at the menu.lst before rebooting as for some
reason it put in the new kernel boot entries with references to
(hd2,0).  These, as i had looked, were changed manually to (hd0,0) and
this system rebooted fine but I was wondering has anyone else seen
this / know what is causing this and how to stop it happening so I
don't have to risk a non-bootable system after a future update.  I
would have thought that any future updates would use the existing
entries as a base for future ones?

Tim


-- 
Tim Hempstead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to