virtualbox is better than vmware, i ve tried it more light n fast. u should read alexey eremenko for the installation tutorial search on google "lessons4lizards-fop.pdf"
viva virtualbox > On Dec 19, 2007 5:25 PM, Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi ! >> >> >> I have a tough choice. Client have an Intel-based Quad-Core PC with SuSE >> 10.3, >> and time to time (~1 - 1.5 hours day) needs Win XP with Adobe Photoshop, >> InDesign, Dreamveawer and some weird video editing programs. He does not >> want >> to reboot he;s workstation in "clean" WinXP-only mode. >> >> The obvious cantenders for virtualization are: VMware, VirtualBox and >> Xen >> (KVM/QEMU does not suitable because it lacks guest OS video >> acceleration). >> >> The question is - which of these virtualization solutions will offer >> best >> performance, especially in terms of graphic/video screen redraw, sound >> latency, and 3D graphic ? >> >> >> Thanks in advance for any suggestion(s). > > As to VMware: > The free version, VMware Server, is NOT optimized for desktop use. It > works, but not the way you're describing. You would need to consider > VMware Workstation and I don't have any experience with that. > > Greg > -- > Greg Freemyer > Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist > http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer > First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - > http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf > > The Norcross Group > The Intersection of Evidence & Technology > http://www.norcrossgroup.com > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
