-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Philipp Thomas wrote:
| A .src.rpm doesn't necessarily contain source code! Call me stupid but I still don't see the point of having src.rpm w/o a source inside. | This one contains | the tarball and calls the installer.sh from its .spec file. But then it | packages the files in a .rpm which can be installed like any other | package and also removed without problems. Still you do not explain why using src.rpm instead of rpm! An there shall be no problem of having it in a rpm container. The only explanation i can think of would be a legal issue. But then, why providing such a binary in a repo at all.? | In the future I'd verify such statements before stating them publicly | it'd be less embarassing. Looks like you do have slightly bigger problems than me my friend. - -- All the best, Peter J. N. aedon DESIGNS http://www.hochzeitsbuch.info http://www.hochzeitsbuch.selfip.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHh1r3h8q3OtgoGAwRAvfHAJ9kP4WIVR9B1VwW2CxcPYk96RzfFQCeLvqx KU+bQS+w3WxZmJ4NGnKCK18= =a3Wj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
