Carlos E. R. wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> The Tuesday 2008-01-08 at 09:29 -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
>>>> % df -h
>>>> Filesystem       Size  Used Available Capacity  Mounted on
>>>> /dev/disk/dsk0a  240M  208M     7666K    97%    /
>>>> /dev/disk/dsk0g 1923M 1335M      395M    78%    /usr
>>>
>>>
>>>  Ok, question then.
>>>
>>>  What will happen during boot, if partition /usr fails the
>>> initial filecheck? It can not be mounted, it has to be
>>> repaired first; but the system can not drop you into a
>>> repair mode with a shell, because the shell resides in /usr/bin/
>>
>> Unix admins do not normally create a separate partition for /usr.
>> In Unix, it is a relatively static directory. Also, you need to
>> kick the partition thing, it is an x86ism. Under AIX, there is
>> a root logical volume. One could create separate LVs for /tmp,
>> /var, and /home. Under Solaris, it is slices, and one could
>> create a separate slice for /usr and /home, under the default
>> setup.
>
> Ok, whatever you name them, the significance is that /usr
> is mounted separately above, as 'df' shows :-)
>
>
>> If you cannot mount /usr, then you get a mount failure. Depending on the machine, one could a console message, or one just get to read the numbers on an RS6000. To correct problems, I can always boot into the firmware.
>>>
>>>  What does that unix do? Does it mount /usr readonly?
>> The boot halts.
>> Under ForPro (another version of Unix for those who remember
>> Fortune Systems), the solution was that /usr/bin had a minimum
>> set of utilities. Of course, the mount of another "partition"
>> on /usr meant then overlaid those utilities.
>
> Aha. Which is precisely the point for having certain programs
> in Linux residing in /bin, and it not being a symlink to /usr.
> Linux handles better that situation, IMHO.

Yes.  Linux still has them in the original location (/bin).
Why in the world they were moved in AIX, Solaris and HP-UX
is beyond me.  It's not "heretical", merely nonsensical.

>
> What is the advantage of having that symlink, then? There surely must be something.

As someone with 25 years of experience with Unix, I
know of NONE.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to