Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello
>
> Probably a stupid question: I thought that recent 2.6 kernels make the
> need for a SMP and non-SMP kernel obsolete. Maybe my memory is playing
> tricks again. The reason I ask is the on some PCs, 10.3 installs kernel
> 2.6.22.5-31-default, while on others it installs 2.6.22.5-31-SMP. In
> both cases the install was let do whatever it wanted in selecting the
> kernel version. Have I missed the obvious? Again?

Are you sure it is the SMP kernel and not the bigsmp one?  There's no
explicit SMP one anymore.

Please run "rpm -qa 'kernel-*'" and check what is installed,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
   Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgpUOFoALPJOX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to