XWork would resolve all the open issues. Work on resolving them in WebWork 1.3 isn't really my place. Hopefully when Matt gets a chance to breath again he can check in to it.
-Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vedovato Paolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:20 AM Subject: AW: [OS-webwork] XWork > see inline > > >As I said previously, this effort wouldn't be in replacement > >of getting 1.3 > >out the door. Work on this and work on 1.3 could happen at the same, > >especially since this is effectively a new project in some > >sense (new CVS > >module, new package namespace, new documentation, additional > >goals). As for > aha, ok i didn't catch that. so under this circumstances I don't see > any problems either - as long as there is really > work going on the webwork cvs module ;-) and a new release > is faced and planned. > > >a 1.3 release, I really can't say what's happening with that. > >I use WebWork > >from CVS and has stablized in the last few weeks and is > >working great under > >Orion -- the only server I work on. Other app servers, > >especially WebLogic, > this is right but there are some problems which seem not app server related, > which > should be fixed to have the cvs working 'fully'. see this bug for > example (it happens also using orion): > redirect bug: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1155442&forum_id=1023 > 7 > another decription of this: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1180770&forum_id=1023 > 7 > > -paolo > > > > >-Pat > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Vedovato Paolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 11:51 PM > >Subject: AW: [OS-webwork] XWork > > > > > >> just my 0.02$: > >> > >> don't make the move to xwork now. we have been waitig a long > >time for a > >new > >> release. I hoped to get a 1.3 release with all the fixes and > >enhancements > >> done in the past months. for me it can be also a 2.0 > >release. but the most > >> important part is to have a 'bug free' and stable webwork release out > >before > >> doing such a big shift. My major fear is to have to wait > >again a long time > >> to have something stable and production ready. > >> > >> so please fix all remaining bugs (see mailing list + jira) > >and feed in all > >> new enhancements and than start the big shift. > >> > >> so the migration is based on a 'finished', stable release.. > >> > >> -paolo > >> > >> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> >Von: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:plightbo@;cisco.com] > >> >Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Oktober 2002 20:42 > >> >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >Betreff: [OS-webwork] XWork [Was: PropertyEditors question] > >> > > >> > > >> >> > -Ditch JavaBeans, replace with OGNL > >> >> > >> >> What does this mean? > >> ><snip> > >> >> > -support a flexible input validation/type conversion > >system for all > >> >> > dispatchers > >> >> > >> >> Yup, that would be nice. As I said, preferably something > >simple which > >> >> performs well (i.e. stateless). > >> > > >> >These two are sorta similar. I mean instead of using all the > >> >JavaBeans API > >> >stuff (PropertyDescriptors, et all) we switch to using > >something that > >> >performs better and does a better job. OGNL (www.ognl.org) > >> >does a great job > >> >of converting in a smart manner. This means that going from > >> >String[] -> long > >> >will be done if it can (ie: the String[] is size 1 and the > >content is > >> >convertable). It also has pluggable conversions that work > >somewhat like > >> >PropertyEditors (set/getAsText) except that they are much > >> >easier to put in > >> >place and use. > >> > > >> >Data validation is related, but somewhat different. Something > >> >like FormProc > >> >might be good here, but I haven't dug in enough to say for sure. > >> >Fortunately, this is something that can be added as an > >> >afterthought, since > >> >the base Action interface has no concept of validation (simply > >> >create bean, > >> >set values, execute). > >> > > >> >-Pat > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >------------------------------------------------------- > >> >This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in > >> >Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be > >> >fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com > >> >_______________________________________________ > >> >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >> Welcome to geek heaven. > >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >Welcome to geek heaven. > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >_______________________________________________ > >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
