I hear ya, and I feel your pain. The problem is that nobody (me especially) likes to write documentation. Open Source projects are based on volunteer labor and it's not like you can make people do what you want them to do. If Matt hadn't gritted his teeth and bore down on the problem you wouldn't have the skimpy documentation that exists today.
Your feedback was good. We need to know that the docs still need more work. But...
Geoff Carruthers wrote:
For all the ink you spilled in complaining about the state of the documentation, you could have edited the pertinent parts of what you had read on the list into the current docs and posted them in Jira. Then I could merge them without spending all day checking my bad spellling and grammers and we could really help somebody.You guys have a great product in WebWork, but it is *incredibly* frustrating trying to find answers about how to use it in the skimpy documentation. For all the ink you spill over issues like this and null tests vs. boolean tests, you would think some of it could find it's way into the docs where everybody would be enlightened.
-Maurice
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
