Oh, good! I just thought two different ServletDispatchers would be nice to offer flexibility, but maybe only one is needed. Either way, doing it this way is nice also because internal actions are now not exposed at all. One of these days we might want to rename views.properties, since it's not views at all anyone, but action definitions. In fact, I'd be all for requiring an action to be aliased before it can be used (not more looking in the package). I alias all my actions before using them. This sorta goes back to my original hope that configuration be simplified and make much more sense in version 2.0.
-Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maurice Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:17 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork Security Requirements > This suggestion is virtually the same one that is in Jira right now. > Except the Jira suggestion doesn't include requiring separate dispatchers. > > Patrick Lightbody wrote: > > ><snip> > > > >Why not just provide two ServletDispatchers? One that works the way > >everything does now (but just reading views.properties) and another that > >reads a mapping file that maps path to WebWork alias/action: > > > >mapping.properties: > >/secure/Foo.action=Foo > > > >views.properties > >Foo.action=Foo > > > >This could be done right now by just writing your own > >MappedServletDispatcher, maybe someone should write it and then contribute > >it back to OpenSymphony. This is a perfect example where we can add more > >features without complicating the basic principle of keeping up-front usage > >simple. That's my two cents, but of course, I'll go with whatever the core > >WebWork decide. > > > >-Pat > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in > >Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be > >fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com > >_______________________________________________ > >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in > Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be > fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
